Laura Parkinson (stormfeather) wrote,
Laura Parkinson
stormfeather

  • Mood:

Content soon but...

For now, I liked this meme and had to try it out.





Pure Geek

43 % Nerd, 60% Geek, 39% Dork

For The Record:

A Nerd is someone who is passionate about learning/being smart/academia.
A Geek is someone who is passionate about some particular area or subject, often an obscure or difficult one.
A Dork is someone who has difficulty with common social expectations/interactions.

You scored better than half in Geek, earning you the title of: Pure Geek.


It's not that you're a school junkie, like the nerd, and you don't
really stand out in a crowd, like the dork, you just have some
interests that aren't quite mainstream. Perhaps it's anime, perhaps
it's computers, perhaps it's bottlecaps, perhaps it's all of those and
more. Your interests take you to events and gatherings that are filled
with people you find unusual and beyond-the-pale, but you don't quite
consider yourself "of that crowd." Instead, you consider yourself to be
fairly normal.



Which, you are.



Congratulations! You're the one on the RIGHT!





Also, you might want to check out some of my other tests if you're interested in either of the following:



Buffy the Vampire Slayer




Professional Wrestling
















My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 19% on nerdiness
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 75% on geekosity
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 67% on dork points




Link: The Nerd? Geek? or Dork? Test written by donathos on Ok Cupid



I'm a bit surprised, I would have thought I was more nerd than I tested ask. Not that I'm surprised at being called a "pure geek" at all...
Tags: memes
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments